Two recent Supreme Court decisions present conflicting perspectives on “ghost guns.” ...

Proponents of evidence-based policymaking advocate developing and applying evidence as a way for the federal government to ...

The San Francisco decision is troubling because it shifts the burden of pollution prevention from the permit holder to the ...

The Supreme Court limits judicial remedies and increases deference to executive power in immigration enforcement.

That’s why behavioral economics can be so useful in tackling pernicious health problems. It allows us to preserve people’s ...

Scholars reflect on the continuing impact of the No Surprises Act.

The Supreme Court validates political control over public health decisions.

Authorization for FEMA’s search and rescue response to the Texas floods took over 72 hours, and some teams arrived a week ...

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bondi v. VanDerStok in October 2024. The case involved a challenge to the Biden Administration’s effort to subject gun assembly kits—colloquially known as ...